I've been bombarded by shifts in vocabulary lately. In an accelerating society, it seems like Christian jargon is the one thing evolving faster than technology.
Of course, some remain in the Dark Ages and still call themselves Christians, use war rhetoric, preach sermons, and sing hymns. Others, however, have adopted a new language that's more emergent, more seeker-friendly, or more radical. They are followers of Christ who speak love, give talks, and sing songs. I'm not condemning any of these terms; I even think they are fundamentally good, but as linguistically progressive Christians often shy away from words like Christian, spiritual gifts, or even Holy Spirit, there's a group left precariously in the middle.
Last night, I walked along Venice Beach, enjoying the sunset, talking with individuals experiencing homelessness, and learning from world travelers. The night was perfect -- the sun setting behind palms and the moon starting to shine as the sky darkened. The company was even better. Laughter and joy were all around as we all shared our food and talents together. I was with a few friends from church, and our company asked a couple of us if we were "Christians." Insert silence and awkward sounds. The next question was if we were part of a church. Remove silence, insert lots of "kind of" or "not really." Then my friends turned to me, "How would you answer that, Josh?"
I, too, scrambled in my brain for a moment. I became part of that group left precariously in the middle. You see, I've been in the process of struggling with this new vocabulary and feeling strange abandoning terms like Christian and church. Before I answered the question, I had the advantage of time to compose my thoughts and know my position, and I semi-reluctantly replied, "Yes." Time slowed as we waited to see how those around us would respond. The next comment was heartbreaking. Our new friend, Bubbles the ukulele player, between drags of his freshly rolled joint, told us, "You guys shouldn't be ashamed to be Christians."
In my mind, I was immediately taken to a meeting of Christians Anonymous, and I was standing. "Hi, my name is Josh, and I am ashamed of the gospel."
Walking away from the beach last night, I realized that my language is far less important than I imagined it to be. In that moment, I projected all my hurts and scars from the church onto Bubbles, Ky, and even Delilah the cat. I thought, "Christians have hurt me, so I don't want to be called by their same name." Interestingly, as we talked by the beach, my new friends didn't care what I said I was, they cared about who I really am and how I lived. It wasn't about my vocabulary, it was about my life.
I agree, it's foolishness to assume that our vocabulary today should match our vocabulary a hundred years ago. Language should be precise so we can effectively communicate the heart of God and the message of Christ. There are words that need to go, I wouldn't deny that. And perhaps I'm just a little behind the curve on what words have strong negative connotations. But I think there are problems in the complete vocabulary overhaul that we sometimes seek.
The vocabulary-centric gospel is one of public relations, not intimate relationships. If I only intend to spend a few minutes of my life with someone, every word's importance increases exponentially. If I intend to share my life with someone, however, my words diminish and my life speaks. Living your faith out in your community can never be replaced by speaking your faith with effective communication.
Language has the interesting property of being symbolic. If we ever say, "I am [blank]," then we constantly define what it means to be blank. If you say you are a Christian, then those around you reshape their idea of a Christian based on your life. If you say you are a believer, then again, those around you reshape their idea of a believer based on your life. As we walk into the world, we are the ideas that our symbolic language represents. Christianity is constantly defined and re-defined based on our lives.
Above all, "...and be always prepared to give an answer to everyone that asks you to give an account of the hope that is inside of you." Whether we call ourselves a Christian, a follower of Christ, or a nonreligious revolutionary of the true teacher is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the way we live our lives makes others ask, "Why?" and that we can then give an answer to them -- that Christ is the hope in us.
Joshua is a young, married twenty-something who believes the gospel should be communicated with clarity and passion, through actions before words. He writes at Church Marketing Sucks and on his Twitter page, and he currently resides in beautiful Athens, GA.
I, too, have uttered those awkward hesitant replies when asked if I'm a Christian. Its hard because we don't want to be pigeon-holed. We don't want to be judged based on those crazies who also are called "Christians" in the same way that many others don't want to be judged based on their label.
Just weeks after my husband and I experienced *dramatic* conversions to Christ in the mid-90s, our band played the Whiskey-a-Go-Go with some new lyrics about our newfound faith. (We were booked before this all happened.) After our set, a couple came up to us and asked, "Are you guys Christians?!?" We just looked at each other and mumbled something under our breath to the affirmative.
By God's grace, we became much bolder after that! ;-)
@Tom, this is a great point. We do completely need to act with just as much love, grace and compassion inwardly as we do outwardly.
@Bernadette I have a lot of respect for the Catholic church's adherence to tradition. I don't think it's right for everyone, but I personally can be very moved by the fact that they do not follow every whim of our culture. I'm glad you guys have become more bold!
@talia I completely agree with this. I've been feeling an increasing amount of tension as word spreads of evangelicals being more supportive of torture than their unchurched counterparts (http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/04/30/religion.torture/index.html).
Think Christian published a great article recently dealing specifically with "follower of Jesus" http://www.thinkchristian.net/index.php/2009/05/04/why-follower-of-jesus-is-weak/
I really appreciate the article, it is well written and addresses a major point that needs to be talked about and defined Biblically. I am not very concerned with which term we call ourself, Christian, follower, disciple. All of them are true and all are valid.
One thing we do want to be careful of is not losing the meat of the Gospel in our language. I don't think we need to use "washed in the blood of the Lamb" all the time, but this emerging trend in American culture, and in American Christianity is approaching a critical junction where we could lose the message about salvation itself. Following Jesus without believing in the Gospel (His death, resurrection, and Him as the sole path to God/Heaven) is pointless. We need to carefully choose our language to display all the pieces of the Gospel so that people will actually be transferred from darkness into Light. If they aren't getting that, then all of their following Jesus or liking Him isn't worth anything.
And the term "church" NEEDS to be redefined as well, because for too long it has been accepted that "church" is a service that one attends for two hours on Sunday while sitting in a row with other believers, and that doing so is what it means to be "fellowship with the saints." This is so far away from any Biblical understanding of what church is or how it functions that we even confuse ourselves with the term.
So, well, I guess I completely disagree with the premise of this article. If I met the same guy on the beach, I would have told him, "I'm not ashamed to be known as one of Jesus's followers brother - I'm just not into the whole christian thing. There's a difference." But for some people, that difference isn't clear and so for them, denying christianity is tantamount to denying Christ, and yet for the rest of us, there is a clear line already drawn. And I think - this is a sign of good things.
It inevitably becomes a matter of semantics - which doesn't really the situation at all. People will call themselves whatever they wish, but this doesn't change what is true about them.
I hardly think, then, that the problem here is with the term "Christian."
Lately, (I'm over 60 and a little more tired...)I say "I don't talk about myself." That answers EVERYTHING...from "Do you go to church?"..."What church do you go to?"...pretty much EVERYTHING!
Labels are for people who only want to know "about" you (shallow assumptious folks).....instead of get to "know" you.
Joshua- Very thot-provoking article. Glad to read it!
* If there is one thing in my life that I am not ashamed of, it is the Gospel
* I am not ashamed of the Gospel! I am not ashamed to be called a Christian!
For me being a Christian mean that I am a follower of Christ. Plain and simple: Just because someone claims to be a Christian does not make it so.
In Matthew 7:21 Jesus said "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven". The Bible tells us that "YOU WILL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUITS”. As Christians, we need to focus on pleasing God and not our self or anyone else.
First and foremost, I represent Christ not another Christian. I will not water down the gospel to make people feel comfortable. No matter what, trust the word of God. Jesus, in the Book of Revelation, said, "Do not add to, or take away from, the Word." In John 10:35, He said, “the Scripture cannot be broken”.
Don’t take me wrong, I am not claiming to know it all or righteous because we all have sin and fall short of the glory of God. If it was not for the blood of Jesus, where would you and I be? His blood washes away all our sins
It's a hard struggle every day to live and walk in the light of God. But I live everyday praying and trusting that he will help me find balance. "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God." Matthew 5:9. Let pray for one another and not get caught up into others weaknesses.
Add Your comments:
Use this form only to comment on the article that you just read.
If you have a question, please click here to use the Contact form instead. Thanks!